Sunday, September 30, 2007

GrizzlyMan

So I finally watched the documentary Grizzly Man tonight. I put it off for the longest, but it was a highly rewarding experience. In fact, one of the better documentaries I have seen. I suppose it is more commonly remembered as the movie about the guy that was eaten by a grizzly bear.

Timothy Treadwell was definitely "one-of-a-kind". An eccentric character, indeed. But as the movie went on, I found myself relating to his harmony-in-nature over horror-of-mankind personality. You could feel his sincerity. It must be noted that most of the movie is footage that he shot himself over the 13 year period that he lived with Grizzlies in Alaska (during the summers). So you get lots and lots of insight into the man's mind. He loses that mind in a few scenes. Surely a glimpse into his personal demons. After all, you have to be slightly off-kilter to live with grizzly bears!

I found it amazing that he spent 13 summers with them, and in very close quarters. Making it more amazing is the manner in which he died during his 13th summer.
He was going home at his usual time, but he had complications at the airport. Fed up with society, he said screw this, I am going back. So he goes back during the dangerous transition into fall/winter, and most of the bears he knew had left to hibernate. What was left were rogue outsider bears that he was not familiar with, that were basically starving. They needed to eat, and eat good, before hibernation. All of the smaller animals had packed it in, and the trout were gone. He runs into one of them at the wrong time, and is killed for food.
So back to the amazing part...had he not made this mistake of wearing out his seasonal welcome into October, how long could he have done this? There was debate over whether he was right or not...Whether a Thoreauian existence in the wild could be less dangerous, and more beautiful, than you believe. I think he was on to something. Dangerous carnivores, yes. But ravenous man-eaters, no (generally speaking). In the footage of his final days, the tone of his surroundings looks vastly different than the rest of the movie. The weather and atmosphere are stark, as if to warn any one that doesn't belong there to leave.

Also, I really liked a series of scenes when he had to deal with the reality of nature. He had an optimistic and harmonious view of nature. Everything beautiful and in balance. But reality sets in when he encounters the remains of a cub. Male bears will kill cubs so the mothers stop lactating, which frees them up to be mated with again. Then, there is a drought that prevents the trout from coming upstream to eat. He finds the remains of a cub that had been eaten by other bears for food. Lastly, he finds a baby fox half-eaten by wolves. (He was 'friends' with the foxes, and they followed him around!) I share similar harmonious views and can relate to the moments when horrors of nature reveal themselves. [I am sure all of us get those Discovery-Channel-feelings every now and then.] Something so beautiful, yet so terrible. Many will chalk it up to cruel Darwinian simplicity. But for me it is much more complex, one of many themes in a life-long spiritual journey. The abundance of creation, filled with hoaxes of cruelty.

After watching the movie, you really feel close to what he was doing. And when it is all over, the story of his death becomes much more visceral and sad.




Wednesday, September 26, 2007

KidNation Slaughterhouse!

So on KidNation tonight, they decided to show the kids how food is made...and maybe even teach them a fact of life. They subjected the kids to a little "gather 'round the killin' log!" That is, they invited them to watch a couple chickens getting their heads chopped off. Including the headless flapping of wings and reflexive twitching.

I propose that this is not a "fact of life". Beheading a chicken to eat it is a choice. Only in the most dire circumstances may one be forced to eat meat. So I find it cruel and unusual to forcefully show this to a bunch of children. Conversely, I do think people should see how their food is made, when they are intelligent enough to make their own food choices outside of what Mommy and Daddy cook for them.

"But Wes, this is how the world eats. It is a fact of life. The chicken has to die anyways for the kid to eat it, so why not let them see it."
To that I say... Sex is a fact of life. The human race would be extinct if we didn't procreate. You wouldn't be a kid unless your Daddy and Mommy bumped uglies. So since sex is a fact of life, we should obliterate the minimum age to buy porn. From now on, kids will be allowed to rent the hottest new porno releases. Sex is a fact of life, so the kids are gonna see some sex, dammit!

Why is it different? Preposterous! The insane meat consumption in the world, with the out-of-control population, will eventually destory our natural resources. It is especially bad in this country, where it has become commonplace to eat meat for 3 meals a day. Were we ever intended to eat that much meat? The medical establishment overwhelmingly states that 30% of cancer is linked to meat-based-diets, and that not eating red meat can drastically reduce your risk of cancer (that is, red meat causes cancer). In fact,
they recommend a vegetarian diet to prevent cancer. So training kids to eat meat without giving them the choice is pretty dangerous stuff. Maybe not as psychologically damaging as showing them porn. But equally damaging to their bodies, as you are conditioning their diet for life. And they are still objectifying women by age 15 anyways, MTV and beer commercials do the trick just as well as porn...

Oddly, they edited much of it out of the TV show, yet the kids got the full, real-life picture. Therefore, we are not able to handle the way food is made...but a group of 10-year-olds are.

*Disclaimer - I don't watch the show, I just flipped on it the moment it was happening. KidNation can burn in hell. Burn their flag, stomp on it, and piss the flames out.


Thursday, September 20, 2007

Blog University

I know this has been repeated on local news for the last few days. But UCF blew it with the water situation at the new Bright House Stadium. The university officials that keep spewing about how they were within code and keeping under budget need to pipe down. They go on the news defending the lack of free water! The nerve! How much would it cost to put in some nice water-dispensing facilities? Maybe a big walk-through fountain, Bonnaroo-style, for people to soak in, drink, and fill their water bottles up. You could ask Bright House for another $20,000 in their 15-year naming rights contract. What are they going to do, say no?

The planners say that it would be impractical to expect 45,000 people to share water fountains. That might be true. But we are talking about the principle here. It's water! So they choose to:
a) "stay within code" and not plan ahead by installing water facilities
b) not allow people to bring in their own water for "security reasons"
c) sell 20oz. bottled water at concession stands for $3.00
A+B+C=greed. I wonder if the luxury boxes have water? Also, did they think 45,000 people would share space at the concession stands better than they would at water fountains? I suppose not, because you also have to wait 20 minutes to get your 20oz. bottle of water.

So now they are caving in and installing water fountains after the fact, now that they have felt the media heat. What did you think would happen?

We are talking about water here, right? The abundant matter that is the basis of all Earthly life, and comprises 90% of our bodies? Or does that have a price tag, too? (Not to mention we are in a state that borders almost ALL WATER.)

___________________________________________________________________

This just in, police offers are taser-gun trigger happy. Don't get me wrong, the UF student was definitely unruly. Someone else was asking a question at the microphone, and this moron cuts in front of him. I am all for free speech and questioning authority, but have a little respect for your fellow students. He sounded like a rookie leftist that just read his first Noam Chomsky book and learned the show is fixed. It goes way beyond John Kerry, bro.

Anyways, the guy gets escorted out and keeps pulling away from the officers, flailing his arms about. Do they have a right to grab him and pull him out forcefully? Well, they were already hellbent on kicking him out. So would he have left if they asked politely? Probably not.

But this is where the cops went wrong.

At that point, in the back of the auditorium, a trained police officer knew this guy wasn't armed. So where is the threat? Why use a weapon? His resistance was obviously because he wanted to make a stand for free speech. (When cops start grabbing at your arms when all you are doing is speaking into a microphone, that gets into fascist territory. I understand his disdain.) So once the guy lost his cool and made a scene, you decide to drag his ass out of there. If he becomes difficult, you take him down to the ground, handcuff him, and carry him out. In the context of this story, I can live with that.


However, since the widespread use of taser guns, cops are way to eager to use them
(including innocent bears). It has become the Showtime Rotisserie Oven of crowd control. Drunk vagrant resisting arrest? Shock him! It's as easy as 1...2...3! Police officers, including the ones in this video, use it as a threat. Why did he need to be tased? I have seen officers subdue criminals on Cops in much more difficult situations. Even life-threatening. Why can't they just tackle guys the old-fashioned way? The perp might get a forearm/face/concrete sandwich, but you don't have to torture them.

He definitely screamed like a little girl.
___________________________________

Orenthal Simpson picked the wrong time to rob a hotel room. Over sports memorabilia? What an idiot. You write a book basically confessing that you murdered your wife (and let's not forget that civil court essentially found him guilty). Then, right when it gets released, you decide to plan a robbery? The entire country is talking about you, disgusted by you, and convinced that you walked away from a murder scene. No one is on your side. Now you have to face 11 charges of robbery and kidnapping, with a possibly life sentence. Lock this fool up.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Mountaintop Removal

Here is a video on mountaintop removal and the destruction of the Appalachian Mountains. This is mass destruction of America's environment "right in our backyard" (other than subdivisions and stripmalls). But it gets the "out of sight, out of mind" treatment. You can't be patriotic and love America if you support this in any way. Passivity=Support. So there is a link to a major petition at the bottom, with the intention of saving the regions water supply.








This link will take you to the Bill Moyers Journal video report on the issue.



Say No to the Blowing Up of Appalachia

Picture of Mountaintop Removal SiteThe Bush administration has already relaxed Clean Water Act safeguards that protected Appalachian mountain streams from mountaintop removal mining and "King Coal." Now, the administration is trying to weaken the "buffer zone rule," a Reagan-era protection that prohibits coal-mining activities from disturbing areas within 100 feet of streams.

If this new rule goes forward, coal companies will be allowed to dump massive amounts of waste directly into streams, destroying them completely. Already, nearly 2,000 miles of mountain streams in Appalachia have been permanently buried by mountaintop removal waste. Destroying thousands of miles of mountain streams is more than irresponsible; it is immoral.

The Bush administration has prepared a draft environmental impact study it claims looks at alternatives to the elimination of the buffer zone, but the administration failed to even consider enforcing the existing law as an option!

Now is your chance to say "No" to this latest attempt to weaken or eliminate the buffer zone rule that has protected streams from coal mining activities for decades!

Tell the administration to stop trying to diminish the buffer zone rule and start enforcing it!
You can sign the petition here.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Support whose troops?

Your favorite taxpayer-funded, private militia are murdering Iraqi civilians. You know, the Blackwater soldiers that have all the protective armor, advanced weaponry, and bullet-proof Hummers our troops are supposed to have.

What I enjoy most about this story is that maybe it will revitalize the reporting of a long-running theme in Iraq. [Oh, nevermind. I forgot our "liberal" media is owned by corporate conglomerates that want to keep your thumb up your ass.] That theme is the hundreds of billions of dollars being made in the private sector from the war, much of it being taxpayer-funded government contracts. Relative to this fortune, it would take chump change to properly protect our armed forces. But in reality, this is why the war was started (and oil!). Forget terrorism, WMDs, and Saddam. That is just a smokescreen so we could all be fleeced by the Military-Industrial Complex. No, not my opinion. Fact. People put "Support The Troops" stickers on their cars, but deny themselves the information on how those troops are treated by the government that employs them.

The story:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1662586,00.html?imw=Y

The facts in entertainment form (they also have lots of links to more facts):
http://iraqforsale.org/

In this blogger's humble opinion, these goverment-contracted private soldiers are a glimpse into a very scary future. I can see our government-run armed forces (Army, Navy) being gradually downsized, while the private sector begins to own and train America's armed forces. That is the first step toward a New World Order. This is why I can't understand how regular Americans can blindly adopt the right-wing belief in less government. In the 21st century, less government means more business. It is a scale. Weight taken off one side makes the other side that much heavier. Despite the corruption in our government, at least they have to answer to somebody. [That is supposed to be us.]



Monday, September 17, 2007

Florida Native, Clueless No More!...and the L.O.C. is my mistress.



Or maybe I just didn't care about architecture when I was 10...or 18...or 23...
I just discovered that the largest collection of Frank Lloyd Wright architecture in the world is located in Lakeland, FL. It makes up much of the campus of Florida Southern College, in the form of 9 pieces. Together they are called Child of the Sun. We will be sure to make a trip when classes aren't in session! (More blog at the bottom)














As I mentioned, I stumbled across this yesterday. But after making another, even more awesome discovery...
The
Library Of Congress Prints & Photographs
website! This is the sort of thing that makes me want to spray perfume on my tax dollars. Yeah, that's Drakkar, baby. I will make you breatkfast in the morning.

Much of the site is a historical photograph archive of places and buildings across America. I haven't even seen enough to tell you more. When looking around, the site seems endless. What I enjoy are photos of very old, and very cool, American structures. 17th and 18th century. Even more cool are the black & white photographs of them. If you enjoy old black & white photos like me, this is a candy store. But these are nothing if the scans aren't good. They have that, too! Big, clear, high-res. You can blow them up bigger than the ones I have above. If it is your sort of thing, enjoy!



Sunday, September 16, 2007

Andrew Thompson

Andrew Thompson video on the MySpace front page!? Pretty cool. The man is too creative to be unknown for much longer. His exceptional first album is even out of print and hard to find. Naturally, the new video is getting put down by a bunch of dumbass high schoolers with bad grammar, shaggy hair, and sideways hats. They seem to be too cool for everything. Here is the new one...

Andrew Thompson - In This Town






Add to My Profile | More Videos

But this one is still better!....

Andrew Thompson - We're In Business






Add to My Profile | More Videos

They should have just left "I, Robot" on the shelf and put this out in theaters. It gets right to the point!

Monday, September 10, 2007

Keyser Söze

So Howard K. Stern and Larry Birkhead could be lovers? When I first heard this, I thought...greatest movie-plot-in-real-life of all time? I was in that office at the end of The Usual Suspects, with the whole scheme written all over the room.

So Anna Nicole "falls in love" and marries almost-dead billionaire J. Howard Marshall. The Marshall family hates her from the beginning. They know that once he dies, she is going to try and steal their inheritence from under them. So they have this old connection to a young lawyer named Howard K. Stern, and send him in to legally represent and befriend her. If she wins in court and receives the estate, they have someone on the inside. So she then wins the estate...

For over 10 years Stern plays the mole, gaining Anna Nicole's trust. He plays her games all along, but secretly gets her addicted to pills over time. They can't kill her off just yet, because the estate would go to her son, Daniel Smith. Stern brings in his attractive lover, Larry Birkhead, to have an affair with Anna Nicole...with the goal of having a child. If something were to happen to her, the inheritence would go to the new child (and Birkhead, Stern, and ultimately back to the Marshall family). Just as if Anna Nicole never entered their father's life. But first, they have to remove Daniel Smith from the picture, so they then conspire to kill him with success. Anna Nicole is so "distraught" that she overdoses on pills and dies (with a little help from some "friends").

What a genius plot. This could already be detailed in Rita Cosby's book, but it was fun to think up nonetheless. Who is playing Verbal Kint?



Wednesday, September 05, 2007

George Carlin, Truthspeaker

Did he just say that?

This core set of beliefs which I hold dearly and try to express when necessary, I express sometimes in a disorganized fashion (including this blog). But it is TNT when George Carlin spits the fire. I nearly wet myself.

This needs to be universally accepted by everyone in this country. If you DON'T believe it, then what IS reality and please explain it to me. Seriously. (Even though you are still wrong.)

There is no Democrat or Republican.
There is no Hillary or Barack.
There is no democracy.
There is no choice when the system is homogenized to benefit the few.

Warning: contains the usual George Carlin bad language.







College Hunks...Hauling Junk?


No, it is not a pornography site that comes with a package of 10 other sites free.

http://www.1800junkusa.com/


It is this business, whose trucks I see around the UCF area, where college "hunks"...um... haul your junk. (I'll be you didn't guess that already.) Although the website really does look like one of those "other" sites at first glance, with the font/header and all. Not that I would know.

Well, they won't haul my junk. And if Julie called them, and I came home from class as she watched them lift boxes, as she held our daughter, well...I would probably have a talk with her. After all, I am a college hunk and perfectly capable of hauling junk.

I have always been interested in new inventions and business ideas, wondering...has everything been done? Aside from advancements in technology, it takes some real creativity to think up new ideas in 2007. When I first saw this one a while back, it was one of those "D'oh! Why didn't I think of that?" Here is another one: DOGGIE STEPS! "Hey, let's make portable stairs so aging dogs and cats can easily get onto a bed or into cars!" In this day and age, and 6.5 billion people in the world, no one had thought of this!? No one was having to pick their dog up to put them on the bed, every night, and thought...is there another way?! Simply genius.

But anyways, college dudes hauling away junk...great idea. Sure, only half of the college population (i.e.- females) and 1 out of 10 college males will call you for your services. But there is a great chance that you will get ALL of those people, which is more than any business can ever expect to get from one demographic.

On a side note, I think it would be funny if you called them and instead of a "college hunk", you get the prototypical "truck"-worker (delivery, moving, etc). Some mid-30's recovering crystal meth addict (yet looks 50), stinky and sweaty, looks like he was rolling around in dirt, and looks like he is casing your house. "Um, are you in college?" (Probably not a good idea to question his hunkness.) "What? Um, yeah...uh...business." If only they would legalize crystal meth, he could make a fortune on the prototype for his "dual-chamber, polymer-gel-grip pipe" that prevents finger-burns and ergonomical to promote carpel-tunnel syndrome.